Why does trimming fail in some systems?
Different runtimes and libraries treat Unicode whitespace classes differently.
Unicode includes many whitespace characters that look similar but behave differently across tools.
Inspect pasted text for invisible or risky Unicode characters, visualize findings, and generate cleaned output entirely in your browser.
Drop .txt/.csv/.json here
or click to choose a file (max 2 MB)
| Symbol | Category | Unicode name | Code point | Occurrences | Positions | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No findings No matching characters found in the current analysis snapshot. | ||||||
| Token | Scripts | Risk | Confusables count | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
No homoglyph findings No mixed-script or confusable lookalikes detected. | ||||
| Type | Risk | Range | Controls count | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
No security findings No Trojan Source-style bidi sequence issues detected. | ||||
Advanced JSON report
Share link does not include raw text. Findings only.
Different runtimes and libraries treat Unicode whitespace classes differently.
Not always. Some contexts require preserved line breaks or tabs for readability and semantics.
Normalize at ingestion boundaries, then keep a predictable internal format across your pipeline.